L&T Archive 1998-2003

more undergarments then?
In Response To: Cleanliness ()


] And there you have it. Cleanliness takes work, and work in those days meant servants. If JA is to be believed, ladies were out and about a good deal more than you imply -- the Bennet girls traipsing about the countryside, and the Dashwoods paying calls around London. The world is made of dirt, and a woman in a long dress who goes out in it will invariably get dirty, not to mention the lingering olfactory effect of the healthy glow of exercise.

It seemed to me that it might have been easier to keep a nice dress clean (at least on the *inside* because so many layers (albeit thin layers) were worn underneath, and so there was only the worry to keep the outside clean.

Messages In This Thread

Shallow as a pond...
Colours and fashion
I have always wondered about
We are told..
No man made fabrics in those days
But lots of pollution
The Great White Debate
Those pesky brackets
Don't ask......
Pollution, the V word, etc.
R vs. V (squalor and pollution)
Where there was brass...
A Few Observations
Rosy ?
White
Everyday fabrics, dark colors
Indoors as well
Cleanliness
more undergarments then?
Some more clothing observations
Yes, usually only whites were washed
Wearing white... (Fashion styles)
Great letter! Thanks! nfm
Thanks
You will find this link interesting nfm
Sorry, here it is! nfm
Does not seem to be working!
I loved it! Thank you! nfm
Why it didn't work (use of enn eff emm)