L&T Archive 1998-2003

I was very struck
In Response To: She was no communist ()

] Carol Shields suggested in an interview that Austen left them out as a sign of respect for their role. Other novels used them as comical relief.

by Carol Shields' comments on this in her biography. I agree with the arguments above that there was anyway no reason for JA to include the servants as characters - she was writing about a particular stratum after all - but I also liked the idea that she avoided using them as sort of fodder. I agree that it shows respect.

Messages In This Thread

JA and large incomes.
She was no communist
I didn't make myself very clear, I guess.
Re: JA and working class novels
She could...
I was very struck
JA, Servants, and Social Commentary
Plight of the poor but genteel; invisibility of the servant class
I think you are quite correct, Kay.
Maybe, maybe not
Clever Mr. Shepherd.
Clever Indeed
Looking at her narrowness form the opposite end....
I doubt, Caroline,
I've always felt ...
I also forgot Nurse Rooke in Persuasion.
I doubt, Donald
I'm with Katherine on this one...
She was clearly interested